But because Missouri, Oklahoma and South Dakota have put Medicaid expansion in their constitutions, they can’t easily take those steps. “Legislators cannot change that law without going back ...

The state likely won’t fully meet new Medicaid funding demands, indicating cuts to Medicaid services could follow, lawmakers ...

If Congress goes that route, states would have to come up with $626 billion over the next decade to keep the roughly 20 million people in the expansion population on the rolls. Nine states ...

Voters in three states have significantly limited funding options by enshrining Medicaid expansion in their constitutions. Live updates: Sioux Falls under severe thunderstorm watch until 3 a.m.

Those states with a higher expansion enrollment and spending would be the most financially impacted by the GOP policy, and past Medicaid beneficiaries could suffer from lack of health care access ...

Some Republicans have floated the idea of rolling back the extra federal money going to states to pay for Medicaid expansion. “The federal government is paying 90 percent of the Medicaid expansion.

Rolling back Medicaid expansion in Oklahoma would not be easy. But because Missouri, Oklahoma and South Dakota have put Medicaid expansion in their constitutions, they can’t easily take those steps.

Rep. Jodey Arrington defends budget measure with $880 billion cuts that could target Medicaid 07:37. Washington — House Republicans are facing the difficult task of slashing $1.5 trillion ...

President Donald Trump has promised that the “big, beautiful bill” passed by the Senate and being considered by the House of Representatives will be one of the most successful pieces of legislation in ...