Overclocking the FX-6300 from its stock speeds all the way up to 4.8GHz introduces massive performance gains; at 4.8GHz, our benchmark takes roughly 2/3 the amount of time it takes to run at stock.

In this video, we dive into an exciting comparison between the FX 8350 and FX 6300 processors, paired with the powerful RX ...

The parts released today include the FX-8350, FX-8320, FX-6300 and FX-4320, which are detailed above. Although AMD is releasing four new FX chips, we're only testing the FX-8350 and FX-6300.

In a bit of a switch around from the FX-8350, where it turned up with a 4GHz clockspeed compared to the FX-8150's 3.6GHz, this six-core CPU is set up slower than its Bulldozer ancestors.

The one exception is that the four core FX-4300 processor will have a 4MB L3 cacche assigned to it. The FX 8350/8320 and 6300 will all have access to that large 8MB L3 cache.

So, if you have to upgrade now - I would get another 8GB RAM and the FX-8350 and then wait until later this year for a bigger upgrade. Last updated: Nov 3, 2020 at 07:10 pm CST ...

Previously, AMD’s latest crop of high-end desktop chips consisted of the 8-core FX-8350 and FX-8320, the 6-core FX-6300, and the 4-core FX-4300.

The FX-8350 attacks one of these problems off the bat, the chip's base clock is 11% faster than the 8150's, and its Turbo Mode pushes four cores up to 4.2GHz (the 8150 topped out at 3.9GHz when ...

Although the FX-8350 we’re going to be showing you here today is a new processor, it leverages technologies we’ve previously covered. AMD A10 and A8 Trinity APU: Virgo CPU Performance ...

AMD FX-8350: 40.99 CPU gaming performance Batman: AC: Frames per second: Higher is better AMD FX-6300: 120 AMD FX-6200: 110 INTEL CORE I5-3570K: 164 AMD FX-8350: 114 CPU gaming performance ...

Dropping down from eigh to six cores we find the FX-6300 which will be clocked at a base frequency of 3.5 GHz with Turbo's towards 4.1 GHz. An 6MB L2 cache here as each core has 1 MB of L2.