News

Business Consumer Alliance reports moving companies must implement arbitration programs to resolve disputes fairly, meet ...
Opinion: Zimmerman Reed's Caleb Marker and Ryan Ellersick say recent cases in California show continued reliance on a ...
A few federal appeals court cases demonstrate how the failure to consider the jurisdiction of the court when moving to compel arbitration can potentially come back to cost your client both time ...
In last week's decision from the Supreme Court— American Express Co. v. Italian Colors Restaurant —the Court emphasized that it meant what it actually said.
The UK Supreme Court in a recent decision has clarified the approach to be taken in determining when a matter ought to be referred to arbitration ...
Andrew J. Pincus of Mayer Brown LLP analyzes four decisions by the Supreme Court on the Federal Arbitration Act, noting the rulings were narrow.
The Supreme Court, in a 5-to-4 vote, handed a major win to employers last week with a decision labor law experts are calling the most significant business ruling of this year's term.
Conclusion The Court of Arbitration for Sport is the last hope for athletes and sports organisations seeking resolution for disputes that cannot be settled through other means.
Overall, the Court’s opinion portrays class arbitration as an ill-conceived procedure that combines the cost, delay and “procedural morass” of class litigation with the unreliability of arbitration to ...
New Jersey has tried to chip away at mandatory arbitration, but the court has made clear that unless federal law is changed, mandatory arbitration is here to stay.
December 3, 2021 - It has become increasingly common for shareholders to agree that disputes concerning the ownership or management of a company should be referred to arbitration. This often means ...
However, in a landmark judgment, the Court of Appeal distanced itself from Limak and, correctly, affirmed that Nigerian courts lacked jurisdiction to set aside a foreign-seated arbitration award.