Judge Amit Mehta’s ruling has triggered a potentially yearslong process to decide how to punish the company. For users, it could mean a future in which Google isn’t front and center everywhere.

In a court filing last week, the DOJ proposed a slew of remedies for Google’s alleged antitrust violations. Federal Judge Amit Mehta ruled in August that Google had maintained an illegal search ...

Mehta has been praised for his carefully documented response in the case. As a judge, he has made significant rulings, including cases related to the January 6 Capitol riots.

After ruling for DOJ last summer, Judge Amit Mehta is now holding hearings on remedies. DOJ wants the judge to break up Google and hamstring the search giant in the artificial intelligence race.

Judge Amit Mehta agreed, but with some paradoxical findings. As a preliminary problem, the judge narrowly defined the market in which Google allegedly boasts a monopoly as “general search text ...

Judge Amit Mehta sided the Justice Department, which argued throughout the landmark trial that Goggle has relied on anticompetitive payments with the likes of Apple and AT&T – including $26.3 b… ...

Mehta was not surprised to find that Google had continued innovating, despite the DOJ's claims that search quality had deteriorated. "Google’s penchant for innovation is consistent with the ...

U.S. District Judge Amit Mehta denied an injunction against the DOJ's cancellation of over 360 grant awards, despite acknowledging potential harm to vulnerable communities.

At the status hearing, Mehta ordered OpenAI to share "financial statements, information about the training data for ChatGPT, and assessments of the company's competitive position," Law360 reported.