An IP VPN normally presents an external portal to an entire internal LAN or at least a portion of it. In this narrow perspective, the SSL VPN is indeed more secure.

Meanwhile, CVE-2020-5142 allows an unauthenticated attacker to inject JavaScript code in the firewall SSL-VPN portal. And, several vulnerabilities open a path to DoS attacks and can be used even ...

1) New Portal (VPN > SSL) created 2) New Remote (User > Remote > LDAP) user created that points to the dc in the new domain and the container the test group will be migrated to.

Because the SSL VPN generally allows or disallows access at the URL level, FirePass is able to control access more tightly than simple virtual LAN assignment, which is the most common form of ...

A Sampling of SSL VPNs Array Networks SPX2000 SSL VPN Cisco Systems Adaptive Security Appliance 5550 Microsoft Intelligent Application Gateway 2007 Nortel Networks Alteon 2424-SSL Application Switch ...

Due to a buffer overflow in the SSL VPN portal of FortiProxy, a specially crafted POST request of large size, when received by the product is capable of crashing it, leading to a Denial of Service ...

We tested Whale Communications' SSL VPN back in 2003 and the product didn't fare very well. Microsoft bought Whale in 2006, jettisoned some of the strange idiosyncracies of the product ...

The bug tracked as CVE-2018-13379 is a path-traversal issue in Fortinet FortiOS, where the SSL VPN web portal allows an unauthenticated attacker to download system files via specially crafted HTTP ...

All Check Point network firewalls come with Remote Access, which can be configured as a client-to-site VPN, or set up as an SSL VPN Portal.

It can be configured as a client-to-site VPN for access to corporate networks via VPN clients or set up as an SSL VPN Portal for web-based access.